Share
The fight against false narratives about renewables continues,‌ but community engagement can make a difference.‌
 ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌

Was this email forwarded to you? Sign up here.

Good morning and happy Friday, 


This week, the bipartisan House Problem Solvers Caucus released a sweeping permitting framework that revives familiar proposals to ease the federal process for massive infrastructure projects like pipelines and transmission lines. Although the framework signals possible progress on the issue, “it does not necessarily mean the deal will get enough buy-in to cross the finish line,” and no legislation has been drafted.


And the battle over U.S. offshore wind continues. Last Friday, the Interior Department asked a judge to cancel approval of the Maryland Offshore Wind Project, a move developer U.S. Wind characterized as “politically motivated.” 


Meanwhile, Rhode Island and Connecticut have requested an injunction against the Revolution Wind stop-work order, and a new anti-offshore wind group has formed to “protect the ocean,” but in California, offshore wind (at least the floating kind) has been propped up by Prop 4, which allocates $228 million for port upgrades. 


And in Indiana, the state’s top energy official blasted what she called “disgraceful” county-level restrictions on wind and solar projects. With 72 of the state’s 92 counties imposing some form of ban or limit, she warned that the patchwork approach is driving away investment and undermining Indiana’s business agenda. 


Read on for more.
















Turning NIMBYs Into YIMBYs


A recent article in The Guardian takes a deep dive into how misinformation, fear, and politics caused Walworth County, SD, to “drive away millions” in revenue from a potential solar farm. Although the county is facing significant economic challenges that the project could have helped address, local opposition groups spread wildly exaggerated claims of potential harms, “many of which found fertile ground in the anxieties of Walworth’s residents.” Here’s a closer look:

  • Concerns included the loss of farmland and the aesthetic impact of the project, which would have used around 3,200 acres of the 452,800 acres in the county. The landowner that hoped to host the project on half of his property believed it was a “better use of the land,” particularly given the uncertainty of agricultural markets.

  • Opponents of the project cited debunked claims about solar panel toxicity, EMF radiation, and impacts to local weather patterns, including the mistaken belief that the panels could affect rainfall patterns or “bring in hail storms.”

  • Ultimately, Walworth County passed a strict ordinance requiring solar projects to be one mile from dwellings, effectively blocking the solar project and any future large-scale solar initiatives.

⚡️ The Takeaway


YIMBYs fight back. Community engagement can make the difference between projects getting built or getting blocked. Walworth County is a cautionary tale, but in Santa Fe, a YIMBY coalition is pushing back against falsehoods and winning support for solar. The Clean Air Task Force’s latest report makes it plain: sustained engagement is the key to delivering clean energy. As farm bankruptcies rise and rural economies face mounting pressure, the real test will be whether facts and partnerships can outpace fear.


Americans Want a Stronger Grid


Headlines about rising electricity bills abound, and voters are making the connection: power prices, clean energy, and transmission lines are linked. A new survey by the Conservative Energy Network shows strong public support for expanding the grid to boost affordability and reliability. Here’s the buzz:

  • In addition to Missouri and Arkansas, the survey included respondents in Pennsylvania and Ohio — both stuck in PJM’s backlogged queue. Nearly 90% of voters said they were worried about rising energy costs.

  • Overall, three-fourths of likely voters support expanding the electric grid, and two-thirds favor more transmission lines to connect clean energy and strengthen reliability.

  • A second survey, released by WSP at the RE+ conference, found that 83% of Americans are concerned about affordability, and 65% would accept modestly higher bills if it meant a more reliable grid.

⚡️ The Takeaway


An uphill slog. The Conservative Energy Network survey – which may be the first of its kind in terms of the specific issues it explored – may be something CEN can use to “convince decision makers to take steps to expand the grid.” It also tested messaging, finding (unsurprisingly) that it’s not a one-size-fits-all situation. However, “ultimately, affordability and reliability were the clear consensus energy policy priorities.” The challenge now is translating that voter mandate into federal action on transmission and clean energy buildout.




HALEU on Wheels


Nuclear waste has long been a stumbling block for the U.S. nuclear industry. Unlike other countries such as France, which has developed a robust system for reprocessing spent fuel, the U.S. hasn’t embraced reprocessing, largely out of concerns that the resulting materials could be enriched to weapons-grade levels.


Two companies are hoping to change that, and to address the shortage of domestic fuel production many see as a significant obstacle for the nuclear power industry. If successful, their efforts will help develop a domestic supply chain for advanced reactors.


Curio, a tech startup, just announced major progress on its NuCycle recycling process with help from national labs. They’re working on turning nuclear waste into “enrichment-ready” uranium – referred to as high-assay, low-enriched uranium, or HALEU – that could power next-gen reactors.







This could be a game-changer for advanced reactors in the U.S., because they often use HALEU as feedstock, but commercial scale production of HALEU only occurs in Russia and China. Meanwhile, Oklo, an advanced reactor designer, is diving in with a bold $1.6 billion plan to build a fuel recycling facility by the 2030s.


It’s important to remember that “history counsels humility in the nuclear reprocessing field,” but if the stars align in terms of policy, financing, and safety, these developments could help usher in a new era of nuclear energy in the U.S.





Thanks for diving into the Developer Dispatch with us.
Bantam Communications Logo Footer Banner

Building American power requires a powerful team.

Learn
more

Copyright @ 2025 Bantam Communications, All rights reserved. 


Our mailing address is: 
Bantam Communications
107 W Market Street
Charlottesville, Virginia 22902
United States

  
To stop receiving this newsletter, unsubscribe here.


Email Marketing by ActiveCampaign